So, I was reading this bullshit and it made me annoyed. Obviously. Alan Craig is a friendly, approachable chap (just look at that picture of him in the banner, holding his glasses and everything because he’s just that damn down to earth) and member of the Christian Peoples Alliance which is…I’m not entirely sure. An alliance of Christian people? Well, good for you guys.
The article is about how he’s TOTALLY NOT A HOMOPHOBE, GUYS, but gay marriage is wrong anyway, and he’s written some email urging people to sign a petition to keep marriage between men and women, because that’s what’s good. That’s what’s right. Nothing goes wrong with marriages between a lady and her man. It’s all nice and godly. His email includes fancy, bullshit words like “promoting corrosive relativism and silo multiculturalism” which is the sort of thing people say to sound smart. (Protip for everyone who is ever campaigning for anything ever – there is nothing wrong with using words that ordinary people understand. It’s the difference between your supporters pretending to know what you’re on about, and actually knowing.)
I could write more about why he thinks gay marriage is wrong, and I could write about why I think he’s wrong, but that’s the smart, adult thing to do, and I would much rather copy and paste some of the charmingly prosaic comments and write immature replies to them. Way more fun. Here we go.
‘John’ says: “please do not use the word ‘gay’ to refer to homosexuals.”
- Why not, John? Could you elaborate a little further? Please remember that Alan Craig likes to use some nice, non-offensive (remember, TOTALLY NOT A HOMOPHOBE, GUYS) terms such as “gaystapo” and “homosexualstapo” doesn’t have the same ring.
‘Dr Gilbert Cozens’ says: “Dear Mr Cameron, you have a beautiful little girl but if you & your wife and family friends were unable to look after her how would you feel about her being fostered or adopted by a homosexual couple, have you any plans to complete your destructive action of our society by legalising beastiality after all it is the only thing that you have left out and will surely be the next demand from the homosexual lobby, may God have mercy on your soul!”
- I assume this is directed to Cameron-Shiny-Face, our British PM. Does he think Cameron reads a blog called Alan’s Angle? Who knows? Basically, he’s asking Cameron that in the event he and his wife magically couldn’t look after their daughter, and NONE of their friends or family were able to take over, how would he feel about the GAYS doing it. Because that is definitely what’s going to happen if gay marriage becomes okay. You will gain some terrible ailment preventing you from being able to look after your kids, perhaps via the loss of all your limbs, it will spread to everyone around you and the homosexuals will be the only ones left to do any child rearing. Also, apparently the “homosexual lobby” (do you mean lobbyists?) are going to demand you legalise “beastiality” next (not even a word) because the one thing gay men like more than screwing each other is screwing farmyard animals, yup. Final point: SENTENCE STRUCTURING. How are you a doctor?
‘Sid Robbins’ says: “Considering that those with homosexual tendencies make up about 1.5% of society, the rest for some reason choose this lifestyle, which is perversion. This is all about sex, and the fact that what, is not exposed, is what the mating habits of these gays are . It leaves me disgusted,”
- Your command of the English language leaves me disgusted. Also, mating habits?
‘C Barber’ says: “I can’t find acceptable words to describe what homosexual men do to each other. Even using the correct words is distasteful and better kept from open discussion. It is certainly not something to be accepted in a civilised society, but then, does our society, which has deteriorated in so many aspects, have a claim to be civilised anymore?”
- Alright, sunshine. Acceptable words for what they do to each other? How about “make love”? Or sometimes they might just “kiss.” How distasteful of me to say so. Also, “anymore” isn’t actually a word.
‘Margaret Stephenson’ says: “Why were both men and women created if they were not both meant to form partnerships in stable hetrosexual relationships and produce children. Without each separate sex we would not be here now today”
- Why were both female and male sheep created if they were not both meant to form partnership and produce little baby sheep? Sheep, and plenty of other animals, have gay sex, and always have done, and are magically still here. Also, “stable hetrosexual relationships”. What’s the divorce rate again?
‘Sally Carson’ says: “Like your straight-forward comments but the picture may encourage some in the wrong direction”
- I really like this one. The picture in the article is pretty basic, two (somewhat well-defined) men in bed, looking like a couple. Is she saying that picture is hot enough to turn straight men gay? It is a pretty cute picture.
‘John Allman’ says: “I was surprised that Alan didn’t mention the recent ruling of the European Court of Human Rights comment, in a case brought against France, that contracting high parties (countries that have signed up to the convention) were under no obligation to allow same-sex marriage, but that if they allowed same-sex marriages that were purely civil, and they allowed different-sex marriage in churches, they would be obliged also to allow same-sex marriages in churches.”
- You know what, fuck it, I can’t even parse this. LEARN TO STRUCTURE SENTENCES.
‘David Skinner’ says: “Gays do not like to be called homosexual, queer, pinkoe, or even gay,since that term has come to mean naff or rubbish.”
- This guy clearly knows what he’s talking about. I love it when straight people tell everyone what gay people like to be called.
‘Montoya’ says: “Oh please, REMOVE THOSE TWO HOMOSEXUALS in bed from the article! Makes people sick…”
- The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
‘Peter Stokes’ says: “As individuals they need help, as couples they should get no ‘acceptance’ at all.”
- As an individual you need a smack in the face, as a couple I simply pity your partner for having to breathe the same air as you.
…and I’m done. This achieved precisely nothing. Criticising grammar or spelling is not clever or mature. Accusing vehemently hetero people of secretly liking a picture of two guys lying in bed next to each other is something you would expect to hear in a school yard. This post wasn’t insightful or helpful, but wow, it was FUN.
The message is, if you’re going to wantonly criticise LGBT people for whatever bullshit reason, I’m going to make fun of you for being, well, stupid.
